Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 325Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 424Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |