Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.98 vs 2.57, Δ 0.59).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.57Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 399 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 472 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -1.11 | Goals prevented | -1.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.