Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 1.58, Δ 0.38).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- New York City FC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 393 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 476 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.16 | Goals prevented | -0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |