Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (0.53 vs 1.45, Δ 0.92).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 0.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 285Lead |
| 401 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.