Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 1.24, Δ 0.89).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.67 | Goals prevented | 0.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.