Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.17 vs 0.38, Δ 1.79).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 406 |
| 513Lead | Total passes | 490 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.22 | Goals prevented | 1.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.