Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 1.49, Δ 0.71).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 486Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 577Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.84 | Goals prevented | -0.84 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.