Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (20 vs 19 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 35%).
- Orlando City SC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 10Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 19 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 275 | Accurate passes | 376Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.