Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (17 vs 3 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 0%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 533Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 595Lead | Total passes | 401 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.