Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (7 vs 2 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 43%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 546Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.