Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 1.55, Δ 0.94).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 446Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.