Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.62 vs 2.03, Δ 0.59).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (24 vs 16 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 2.06 | Goals prevented | 2.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.