Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (3.21 vs 1.35, Δ 1.86).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 3.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 326 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 482Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.81 | Goals prevented | 0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.