Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 273 | Accurate passes | 400Lead |
| 339 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.