Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 334 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.