Match statistics snapshot
- Real Salt Lake created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 1.80, Δ 0.64).
- Real Salt Lake fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Real Salt Lake was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 350 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Real Salt Lake |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.