Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 1.15, Δ 0.75).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- San Diego was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 552Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.46 | Goals prevented | 0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |