Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (2.72 vs 0.36, Δ 2.36).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.36 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 644Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 705Lead | Total passes | 289 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.27 | Goals prevented | -0.27 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.