Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 27%).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 412Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 504Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.