Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 425Lead |
| 462 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.