Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 463Lead |
| 404 | Total passes | 547Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.