Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 0.60, Δ 0.33).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 388 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 457 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |