Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 1.21, Δ 0.22).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 479Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 555Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.09 | Goals prevented | 0.09 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.