Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.20, Δ 0.45).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 498Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.