Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 30%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 547Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| Yellow cards |