Match statistics snapshot
- Vancouver Whitecaps created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 2.17, Δ 0.91).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Vancouver Whitecaps was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 400 |
| 522Lead | Total passes | 466 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Fire | Statistic | Vancouver Whitecaps |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |