Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (5 vs 2 shots).
- Chicago Red Stars W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Bay FC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 1Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 66 | Accurate passes | 95Lead |
| 89 | Total passes | 120Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Fouls | 0Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.