Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Red Stars W fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 284Lead | Accurate passes | 283 |
| 374 | Total passes | 389Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.