Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dash W fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Chicago Red Stars W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Houston Dash W held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 228 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.