Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 416Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |