Match statistics snapshot
- Utah Royals W fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Chicago Red Stars W was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 31%).
- Utah Royals W held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 408Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chicago Red Stars W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |