Match statistics snapshot
- Oman fired more attempts (29 vs 5 shots).
- Oman was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 0%).
- Oman held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chinese Taipei | Statistic | Oman |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 21Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 29Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chinese Taipei | Statistic | Oman |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 479Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 578Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chinese Taipei | Statistic | Oman |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chinese Taipei | Statistic | Oman |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 13Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chinese Taipei | Statistic | Oman |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.