Match statistics snapshot
- Chippa United fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 35%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.