Match statistics snapshot
- Cape Town City fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Cape Town City was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 0%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 231Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 338Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |