Match statistics snapshot
- Magesi fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Chippa United was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 26%).
- Magesi held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Magesi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 |
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Magesi |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 264Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 374Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Magesi |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Magesi |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Magesi |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.