Match statistics snapshot
- Richards Bay fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Chippa United was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 15%).
- Richards Bay held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 275 | Accurate passes | 339Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.