Match statistics snapshot
- Chippa United fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (88% on target vs 22%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 422Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chippa United | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.