Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 2.13, Δ 0.33).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Chongqing Tongliang Long was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 0 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 264 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |