Match statistics snapshot
- LNZ Cherkasy fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- LNZ Cherkasy was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
- Chornomorets held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |