Match statistics snapshot
- Chornomorets created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 0.74, Δ 0.31).
- LNZ Cherkasy fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- LNZ Cherkasy was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 173 | Accurate passes | 482Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 546Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Chornomorets | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.