Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
- Cienciano held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 284Lead | Accurate passes | 126 |
| 376Lead | Total passes | 213 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.