Match statistics snapshot
- ADT created the clearer chances on xG (0.20 vs 1.17, Δ 0.97).
- ADT fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- ADT was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 303 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Adt |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.