Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 33%).
- Cienciano held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 253 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |