Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.38, Δ 1.04).
- Cienciano fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- FBC Melgar was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 247 | Accurate passes | 248Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 349Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.46 | Goals prevented | 0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Fbc Melgar |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.