Match statistics snapshot
- Cienciano created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 0.16, Δ 1.13).
- Cienciano fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Lanus was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.16 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 317Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.24 | Goals prevented | -1.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |