Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Cienciano was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 45%).
- Cienciano held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 259Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 329Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |