Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca fired more attempts (25 vs 11 shots).
- Cienciano was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 24%).
- Cienciano held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 16Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 19Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 263Lead | Accurate passes | 142 |
| 333Lead | Total passes | 208 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cienciano | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |