Match statistics snapshot
- Cittadella fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
- Cittadella held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cittadella | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cittadella | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 292Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cittadella | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cittadella | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cittadella | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |