Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 22%).
- Dunkerque held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Dunkerque |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Dunkerque |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 291 | Accurate passes | 456Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Dunkerque |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Dunkerque |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Dunkerque |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |