Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Grenoble was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 28%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 548Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.